TaskVerdict

🖼️ AI Image Generation & Editing

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) vs GPT Image (OpenAI)

Which is better depends on the job. Here's how they compare on facts and — where we've run them — our standardized tests.

FLUX (Black Forest Labs)

FLUX family of image generation and editing models, including open-weight versions.

NOT YET TESTED
Visit FLUX (Black Forest Labs)Official site · not an affiliate link
GPT Image (OpenAI)

OpenAI's image generation and editing in ChatGPT and via API.

NOT YET TESTED
Visit GPT Image (OpenAI)Official site · not an affiliate link
✍️ EDITORIAL JUDGMENT

Which should you choose?

NOT YET TESTED We won't name a winner until both tools have completed the same test tasks. Until then, use the verified facts below.

Scores by job

JobFLUX (Black Forest Labs)GPT Image (OpenAI)
Photoreal product & lifestyle shotsNOT YET TESTEDNOT YET TESTED
Posters, ads & images with correct textNOT YET TESTEDNOT YET TESTED
Consistent character / brand style across imagesNOT YET TESTEDNOT YET TESTED
AI photo editing (inpaint, remove, extend)NOT YET TESTEDNOT YET TESTED
Vector graphics, icons & logo explorationNOT YET TESTEDNOT YET TESTED

Facts side by side

From official pages; "Not yet verified" means we haven't confirmed it yet.

FLUX (Black Forest Labs)GPT Image (OpenAI)
CompanyBlack Forest LabsOpenAI
Starting priceAPI from $0.048/imageAPI from $30/1M output tokens
Free planNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
Free trialNot yet verifiedNot yet verified
APIYesYes
Commercial useRestrictedAllowed on all plans
Last testedNeverNever
Facts updatedOct 8, 2026Oct 8, 2026
📁 EVIDENCE

FLUX (Black Forest Labs) vs GPT Image (OpenAI): same prompt, raw outputs

Same input for every tool. We publish the first output (no cherry-picking), with the date, plan and model version used, plus a SHA-256 hash of the file.

NOT YET TESTEDNo outputs published yet.

When the test round runs, each task appears here as a row with one column per tool.

📏 MEASURED RESULT

Head-to-head measurements

Objective metrics recorded by our test harness (same inputs for every tool). Raw outputs are archived as evidence.

NOT YET TESTED
✍️ EDITORIAL JUDGMENT

Blind quality comparison

Subjective assessment by our evaluators, blind where possible. This is opinion, labelled as such — not a measured fact.

NOT YET TESTED

Follow updates

New results, re-tests and major tool releases are posted on our updates page and in the RSS feed. We don’t collect email addresses.

Other comparisons